Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Alton DAVIS, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 2, 2007, which, among other things, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
A claimant who performs activities on behalf of a business, even if such activities are minimal and do not generate income, will not be considered totally unemployed, “ ‘provided that the claimant stands to benefit financially from the continued existence of the business' ” (Matter of Siegel [Commissioner of Labor], 43 A.D.3d 1224, 1224-1225, 841 N.Y.S.2d 415 [2007], quoting Matter of Swan [Commissioner of Labor], 40 A.D.3d 1295, 1295, 835 N.Y.S.2d 774 [2007] ). Here, claimant testified that, at the time he was certifying for benefits, he was the owner of a corporation he formed for the purpose of recording and marketing music and, in connection therewith, he actively worked toward improving and “mastering” his songs with the goal of selling them. Accordingly, substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed (see Matter of Ibrahim [Commissioner of Labor], 45 A.D.3d 1128, 846 N.Y.S.2d 452 [2007]; Matter of Landry [Commissioner of Labor], 45 A.D.3d 1020, 1021, 845 N.Y.S.2d 851 [2007] ).
Furthermore, the fact that claimant received an informational handbook informing him of the obligation to report any business activity that could generate income but failed to do so is sufficient to support the determination that claimant made false statements of fact permitting the recovery of benefits (see Labor Law § 597[4]; Matter of Bothe [Commissioner of Labor], 10 A.D.3d 759, 759-760, 781 N.Y.S.2d 719 [2004]; Matter of Raspallo [Commissioner of Labor], 10 A.D.3d 751, 751-752, 781 N.Y.S.2d 532 [2004] ). That claimant admittedly did not read the handbook does not provide him with a defense (see Matter of Bothe [Commissioner of Labor], 10 A.D.3d at 760, 781 N.Y.S.2d 719).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 11, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)