Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Joseph R. BRANT III, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered June 3, 1996 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner's request for parole.
In January 1993, petitioner was convicted of the crime of arson in the third degree, committed while he was on parole following his 1990 conviction of criminal mischief in the third degree, arising out of another fire-setting incident. In May 1995, after receiving a certificate of earned eligibility, petitioner applied for and was denied parole. In citing the reasons for its denial, respondent noted petitioner's history of arson-related offenses together with his history of alcohol and drug abuse. Respondent also noted that petitioner's criminal record included four prior criminal convictions. Respondent concluded that there was a reasonable probability that petitioner could not remain at liberty without violating the law and posing an unacceptable risk to community safety. Our review discloses that respondent considered the relevant guidelines and statutory requirements in arriving at its discretionary decision to refuse petitioner's application for parole and there is, accordingly, no reason to disturb it (see, Executive Law § 259-i[1], [2]; see also, Matter of Walker v. New York State Div. of Parole, 203 A.D.2d 757, 610 N.Y.S.2d 397; Matter of Patterson v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 202 A.D.2d 940, 610 N.Y.S.2d 96).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 27, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)