PEOPLE v. ROSS (1997)

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), rendered June 21, 1995, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court correctly determined that the statements made to the 911 operator from an anonymous caller qualified as a “present sense impression” inasmuch as they were “spontaneous descriptions of events made substantially contemporaneously with the observation” and “sufficiently corroborated by other evidence” (see, People v. Brown, 80 N.Y.2d 729, 734, 594 N.Y.S.2d 696, 610 N.E.2d 369;  see also, People v. Vasquez, 88 N.Y.2d 561, 647 N.Y.S.2d 697, 670 N.E.2d 1328;  People v. Buie, 86 N.Y.2d 501, 634 N.Y.S.2d 415, 658 N.E.2d 192).   Accordingly, the audiotape recording of the 911 call was properly received in evidence at trial under the “present sense impression” exception to the rule against hearsay (see, People v. Brown, supra).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.