Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Gloria S. CALONGE, an Attorney. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Gloria S. Calonge, Respondent.
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1994. She maintained an office for the practice of law in Virginia.
On October 1, 2007, respondent was convicted upon her plea of guilty in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia of misprision of a felony, a federal felony, in violation of 18 USC § 4. Respondent admitted that she wrote and mailed a letter to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services for the purpose of concealing a fraudulent certification of employment that had previously been submitted to the agency. Respondent was sentenced on January 25, 2008 to 30 days of incarceration commencing July 1, 2008, followed by one year of supervised release to include three months of home confinement, and a $5,000 fine.
Petitioner now moves for a final order of discipline pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(d) and (g) based upon respondent's conviction and sentence for a serious crime. Respondent has filed a reply affidavit setting forth mitigating circumstances. She also states that the Virginia State Bar has suspended her from practice for a period of two years.
A conviction of misprision of felony under 18 USC § 4 constitutes a serious crime pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(d) (see Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 801 N.Y.S.2d 825 [2005]; Matter of Fronk, 238 A.D.2d 82, 666 N.Y.S.2d 1023 [1997] ). As her conviction became final upon sentencing, imposition of final discipline is now appropriate (see Matter of Delany, 87 N.Y.2d 508, 640 N.Y.S.2d 469, 663 N.E.2d 625 [1996] ). Having considered the factors and circumstances presented, we conclude that respondent should be suspended from practice for a period of two years.
ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court; and it is further
ORDERED that, for the period of suspension, respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 806.9).
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 19, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)