Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Donnette M. VESSELIZA, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 28, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was employed as a school bus driver for five years until she was fired for leaving the bus running with 10 students and a teacher on board in order to use the restroom. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, reversing the decision of the Administrative Law Judge, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct. The record establishes that claimant was aware of the employer's policy, which was in accordance with the Vehicle and Traffic Law, that drivers are not to leave the bus unattended with the keys in it while there are people on the bus. Notwithstanding claimant's excuse for her conduct, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision inasmuch as claimant's knowing violation of the employer's policy was potentially detrimental to the employer's best interests (see Matter of Parody [Commissioner of Labor], 7 A.D.3d 868, 869, 776 N.Y.S.2d 141 [2004]; see also Matter of Gallagher [Commissioner of Labor], 13 A.D.3d 702, 785 N.Y.S.2d 593 [2004]; Matter of Guibert [Commissioner of Labor], 254 A.D.2d 661, 662, 679 N.Y.S.2d 452 [1998] ). Claimant's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 27, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)