Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Marni Jo TANNENBAUM, respondent, v. Mark TANNENBAUM, appellant.
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J.), dated December 16, 2005, as denied those branches of his motion which were to hold the plaintiff in contempt for failing to comply with certain provisions of the parties' stipulation of settlement dated June 3, 2005, in effect, to enforce the parties' stipulation of settlement, to direct that the plaintiff pay the defendant's attorney's fees, and to appoint a guardian ad litem for the plaintiff.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the defendant's motion which were to hold the plaintiff in contempt for failing to comply with certain provisions of the parties' stipulation of settlement dated June 3, 2005, because no order or judgment entered upon the stipulation of settlement (hereinafter the stipulation) existed at the time the defendant's motion was interposed (see Judiciary Law § 753; Domestic Relations Law § 245; Rienzi v. Rienzi, 23 A.D.3d 447, 808 N.Y.S.2d 113; Raphael v. Raphael, 20 A.D.3d 463, 799 N.Y.S.2d 108; Ottomanelli v. Ottomanelli, 17 A.D.3d 647, 794 N.Y.S.2d 90).
The issues in the action having been settled by the stipulation dated June 3, 2005, which remains controlling, there was no basis for the appointment of a guardian ad litem for the plaintiff (see CPLR 1201).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 10, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)