Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. Herbert GANNON, Respondent, v. Lawrence SEARS, as Superintendent of Ogdensburg Correctional Facility, et al., Appellants.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered December 29, 2008 in St. Lawrence County, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, and discharged petitioner.
Petitioner was convicted in 1997 of robbery in the third degree and sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 3 to 6 years. The commitment order was silent as to whether such term was to run concurrently with or consecutively to petitioner's prior undischarged prison terms. Respondent Department of Correctional Services calculated petitioner's 1997 sentence as running consecutively to his prior undischarged terms, prompting him to commence this CPLR article 70 proceeding challenging that computation and the legality of his continued incarceration. Supreme Court granted petitioner's application and ordered his release from custody. This appeal by respondents ensued.
There is no dispute that petitioner was sentenced in 1997 as a second felony offender and, therefore, was subject to the consecutive sentencing provisions of Penal Law § 70.25(2-a). Where a sentencing court is required by statute to impose a consecutive sentence, it is deemed to have imposed the consecutive sentence the law requires-even in the absence of an express judicial directive to that effect (see People ex rel. Gill v. Greene, 12 N.Y.3d 1, 4, 875 N.Y.S.2d 826, 903 N.E.2d 1146 [2009]; People ex rel. Nadal v. Rivera, 63 A.D.3d 1434, 880 N.Y.S.2d 585 [2009]; People ex rel. Hunter v. Yelich, 63 A.D.3d 1424, 880 N.Y.S.2d 584 [2009]; People ex rel. Driscoll v. LaClair, 63 A.D.3d 1364, 880 N.Y.S.2d 404 [2009] ). We therefore discern no error in the computation of petitioner's sentence (see Matter of Grey v. Fischer, 63 A.D.3d 1431, 882 N.Y.S.2d 322 [2009]; People ex rel. Taylor v. Brown, 62 A.D.3d 1063, 1064, 877 N.Y.S.2d 707 [2009] ). Accordingly, Supreme Court's judgment is reversed and the petition is dismissed.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 08, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)