Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Cary HUNT, Respondent, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered December 3, 2008 in Franklin County, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to annul a determination of the Department of Correctional Services calculating petitioner's prison sentence.
In November 2004, petitioner was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 3 to 6 years upon his conviction of robbery in the third degree. Neither the sentence and commitment order nor the sentencing minutes made any mention of how this sentence was to run relative to petitioner's prior undischarged prison terms. The Department of Correctional Services calculated petitioner's 2004 sentence as running consecutively to his prior undischarged terms, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge that computation. Supreme Court annulled the determination and this appeal by respondent ensued.
Where a sentencing court is required by statute to impose a consecutive sentence, it is deemed to have imposed the consecutive sentence the law requires-even in the absence of a judicial pronouncement to that effect (see People ex rel. Gill v. Greene, 12 N.Y.3d 1, 4, 875 N.Y.S.2d 826, 903 N.E.2d 1146 [2009]; People ex rel. Gathers v. Artus, 63 A.D.3d 1435, 880 N.Y.S.2d 586 [2009]; People ex rel. Hunter v. Yelich, 63 A.D.3d 1424, 880 N.Y.S.2d 584 [2009]; People ex rel. Styles v. Rabsatt, 63 A.D.3d 1365, 879 N.Y.S.2d 735 [2009] ). As a second felony offender, petitioner was subject to the consecutive sentencing provisions of Penal Law § 70.25(2-a) and, therefore, we discern no error in the computation of his sentence (see Matter of Grey v. Fischer, 63 A.D.3d 1431, 882 N.Y.S.2d 322 [2009]; People ex rel. Taylor v. Brown, 62 A.D.3d 1063, 1064, 877 N.Y.S.2d 707 [2009] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent not specifically addressed, have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 08, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)