Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Leona FREDERICK, Appellant, v. LINDENHURST UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Respondents. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed July 3, 2008, which, among other things, ruled that the death of claimant's decedent was not causally related to his employment.
Claimant's husband (hereinafter decedent), a school custodian, went to the school's boiler room on a break from work. Decedent was later discovered there slumped on a staircase, not breathing and unresponsive. He subsequently died and claimant applied for workers' compensation benefits. Following a hearing, a Workers' Compensation Law Judge awarded benefits. Upon review, the Workers' Compensation Board reversed and disallowed the claim, finding that the presumption of compensability contained in Workers' Compensation Law § 21(1) had been overcome. Claimant appeals and we affirm.
A presumption of compensability attaches to a death occurring during the course of employment which is unwitnessed or unexplained (see Workers' Compensation Law § 21[1]; Matter of Hanna v. Able Body Labor, 62 A.D.3d 1200, 1201, 879 N.Y.S.2d 622 [2009]; Matter of Ruper v. Transport Sys. of W. N.Y., 58 A.D.3d 930, 931, 870 N.Y.S.2d 623 [2009] ). That presumption may be rebutted if substantial evidence demonstrates that the death was not work related, however, and such rebuttal does not require “irrefutable proof excluding every conclusion other than that offered by the employer” and its workers' compensation carrier (Matter of Hanna v. Able Body Labor, 62 A.D.3d at 1201, 879 N.Y.S.2d 622; see Matter of Wheeler v. Mail Contrs. of Am., 60 A.D.3d 1245, 1246, 875 N.Y.S.2d 632 [2009] ). Here, both the death certificate and the results of an autopsy attribute decedent's death to arteriosclerotic heart disease.1 Given that proof, as well as the lack of any medical evidence which would call that conclusion into question or otherwise suggest that decedent's work and his death were causally linked, we decline to disturb the Board's decision (see Matter of Hanna v. Able Body Labor, 62 A.D.3d at 1201, 879 N.Y.S.2d 622; Matter of Ruper v. Transport Sys. of W. N.Y., 58 A.D.3d at 931-932, 870 N.Y.S.2d 623; Matter of Schwartz v. Hebrew Academy of Five Towns, 39 A.D.3d 1134, 1135-1136, 834 N.Y.S.2d 400 [2007], lv. denied 9 N.Y.3d 807, 843 N.Y.S.2d 537, 875 N.E.2d 30 [2007] ).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
FOOTNOTES
1. A copy of decedent's death certificate is not included in the record, but the Board expressly relied upon the death certificate in its decision and the parties do not dispute that the certificate lists arteriosclerotic heart disease as the cause of death.
SPAIN, J.P.
ROSE, LAHTINEN, MALONE JR. and KAVANAGH, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 08, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)