Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Gerald GRIFFIN, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violent conduct, fighting, possessing a weapon, creating a disturbance, refusing a direct order and losing state property, all of which are violations of prison disciplinary rules. We confirm. The misbehavior reports with factually specific accounts of the incidents written by the correction officers involved, the detailed unusual incident reports and testimony of the witnessing correction officers provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477 [1990]; Matter of Goncalves v. Donnelly, 9 A.D.3d 721, 721, 779 N.Y.S.2d 842 [2004] ). Petitioner's exculpatory statements as to the nature of the events and the testimony of his inmate witnesses presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Miller v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 295 A.D.2d 714, 714-715, 743 N.Y.S.2d 632 [2002] ).
Petitioner's procedural objections are unpersuasive. The record demonstrates that the hearing was conducted in a fair and impartial manner and the determination did not flow from any bias on the part of the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Cayenne v. Goord, 16 A.D.3d 782, 783-784, 790 N.Y.S.2d 762 [2005] ). There is no merit to petitioner's claim that he was improperly denied the right to call witnesses as he affirmatively advised the Hearing Officer that he did not wish to call further witnesses (see Matter of Johnson v. Goord, 33 A.D.3d 1173, 1173, 822 N.Y.S.2d 822 [2006] ). Petitioner's argument that he was denied access to records in the form of a surveillance videotape is without merit as the record establishes that no recording existed (see Matter of Cornwall v. Goord, 287 A.D.2d 911, 912, 731 N.Y.S.2d 561 [2001] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent preserved, have been reviewed and determined to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 09, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)