Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Bettina R. Weinraub, deceased. Jerome M. Weinraub, respondent; S. Sidney Mandel, appellant. (File No. 1202/83) Sweetbaum & Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N.Y. (Marshall D. Sweetbaum of counsel),
Argued-September 15, 2009
DECISION & ORDER
In a probate proceeding in which Jerome M. Weinraub petitioned to revoke letters of trusteeship issued to S. Sidney Mandel, S. Sidney Mandel appeals from a decree of the Surrogate's Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, S.), dated March 11, 2008, which revoked letters of trusteeship issued to him on April 21, 1983, with respect to three trusts, and appointed Deutsche Bank Trust Company, N.A., as successor cotrustee.
ORDERED that the decree is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant personally.
The Surrogate's Court providently exercised its discretion in revoking the appellant's letters of trusteeship (see SCPA 719[1], [10]; 711[3], [12]; Matter of Duke, 87 N.Y.2d 465, 473). The appellant failed to account over many years, despite repeated requests by a cotrustee and beneficiary, a formal admonition from the Disciplinary Committee for the Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, a court order compelling him to do so by a date certain, numerous promises to the court that the accountings were forthcoming, and a finding of contempt. The appellant, who is an attorney, not only failed to purge the contempt by providing the accountings, but then failed to appear for the subsequent removal hearing and left the jurisdiction despite a warrant of commitment being issued by the Surrogate's Court. Under these circumstances, his removal as cotrustee was warranted.
DILLON, J.P., FLORIO, MILLER and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2008-03696
Decided: October 06, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)