Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
QLISANR, LLC, et al., appellants, v. HOLLIS PARK MANOR NURSING HOME, INC., et al., defendants, Ahron Ebert, respondent.
In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring, in effect, that the defendant Ahron Ebert failed to properly exercise his right of first refusal to purchase the assets of the defendants Hollis Park Manor Nursing Home, Inc., Hollis Park Holding, LLC, and Hollis Park Realty, LLC, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), entered March 1, 2007, which denied their motion for summary judgment on their cause of action for declaratory relief.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on their cause of action for declaratory relief. Triable issues of fact exist as to, inter alia, whether the respondent, Ahron Ebert, improperly sought to exercise his right of first refusal by seeking to purchase only the assets of the defendant Hollis Park Manor Nursing Home, Inc. (see Laramie Springtree Corp. v. Equity Residential Props. Trust, 303 A.D.2d 464, 758 N.Y.S.2d 74), or whether, on the other hand, he properly exercised his right of first refusal by agreeing to purchase all of the assets of the defendants Hollis Park Manor Nursing Home, Inc., Hollis Park Holding, LLC, and Hollis Park Realty, LLC (hereinafter collectively the Company), pursuant to the agreement between the Company and the plaintiffs. Accordingly, the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on their cause of action for declaratory relief was properly denied. In light of this determination we need not examine the sufficiency of Ebert's opposing papers (see generally Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324, 508 N.Y.S.2d 923, 501 N.E.2d 572; Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853, 487 N.Y.S.2d 316, 476 N.E.2d 642; Kuri v. Bhattacharya, 44 A.D.3d 718, 842 N.Y.S.2d 734; cf., Yudell Trust I v. API Westchester Assoc., 227 A.D.2d 471, 473, 643 N.Y.S.2d 161).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 06, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)