Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. David JAMES, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered July 29, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was found in his motel room with a packet of $20 bills on his person and a few feet away from two partially-open tissue papers containing 28 tinfoil packages of cocaine. Also present in the room were loose pieces of aluminum foil, a razor with cocaine residue on it, and a second packet of $20 bills.
The trial court was correct in charging the presumption of knowing possession pursuant to Penal Law § 220.25(2), as the defendant was in close proximity to the cocaine and there was sufficient evidence to establish that the substance was being prepared for packaging (see, People v. Frazier, 138 A.D.2d 401, 525 N.Y.S.2d 684; People v. Staley, 123 A.D.2d 407, 506 N.Y.S.2d 469; People v. McCall, 137 A.D.2d 561, 524 N.Y.S.2d 301). Applying this presumption of possession, which was not rebutted, the evidence was legally sufficient to support the defendant's conviction.
The trial court properly allowed expert testimony regarding the packaging of cocaine, since this subject is not within the knowledge of the average juror (see, People v. Vaughan, 187 A.D.2d 685, 590 N.Y.S.2d 246; People v. Gallego, 155 A.D.2d 687, 548 N.Y.S.2d 62).
The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 01, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)