Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: LEON R. (Anonymous), respondent, v. John PALMER, etc., appellant.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPL 330.20(9) for a subsequent retention order, John Palmer, the Executive Director of Kingsboro Psychiatric Center, appeals, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated November 16, 1998, which, upon rehearing and review pursuant to CPL 330.20(16) and Mental Hygiene Law § 9.35, in effect, denied the petition and directed the release of Leon R. under appropriate conditions.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In 1988, Leon R. was committed to a secure psychiatric facility pursuant to CPL 330.20 after he was found not responsible due to mental disease or defect for the death of a fellow prison inmate. In or about December 1989 he was transferred to Kingsboro Psychiatric Center (hereinafter Kingsboro), a nonsecure facility, where, pursuant to multiple retention orders, he has remained. After the appellant obtained the most recent retention order, Leon R. sought and obtained a rehearing and review pursuant to CPL 330.20(16) and Mental Hygiene Law § 9.35. After hearing testimony from Leon R.'s treating psychiatrist and a psychiatrist who testified on his behalf, the hearing court found that Leon R. is neither mentally ill nor suffering from a dangerous mental condition and ordered his release subject to various conditions (see, CPL 330.20[9] ).
The undisputed evidence established that Leon R. has exhibited no symptoms of mental illness during the nine years between his transfer to Kingsboro and the instant rehearing. Moreover, he did not suffer any relapse during a sixteen-month period when his treatment protocol did not include medication. Giving the determination of the hearing court the deference to which it is entitled (see, Matter of George L., 85 N.Y.2d 295, 305, 624 N.Y.S.2d 99, 648 N.E.2d 475), the hearing court properly found that the appellant failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Leon R. has a dangerous mental disorder or that he is mentally ill (see, CPL 330.20[9]; Matter of George L., supra; People v. Escobar, 61 N.Y.2d 431, 474 N.Y.S.2d 453, 462 N.E.2d 1171; Matter of Richard W., 250 A.D.2d 695, 672 N.Y.S.2d 761; Matter of Buthy, 168 A.D.2d 1000, 564 N.Y.S.2d 944). Accordingly, the order, inter alia, directing his release upon appropriate conditions is affirmed.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 01, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)