Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, appellant, v. Dorily LOPEZ, respondent.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7503 to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Schmidt, J.), entered November 30, 1998, which denied the petition.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the petition to permanently stay arbitration of the respondent's claim for uninsured motorist benefits. “Consistent with New York public policy to protect innocent victims of traffic accidents * * * personal protection insurance liability coverage underwritten in a sister State by insurers authorized to do business in New York is required to conform to New York minimum financial requirements and, if not, is deemed to do so” (Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. [Ramos], 234 A.D.2d 41, 42, 650 N.Y.S.2d 210; see, Insurance Law § 5107[a]; 11 NYCRR 65.5). Thus, although the respondent waived uninsured motorist coverage when the appellant issued the subject policy to her in Pennsylvania, that policy “must be construed to contain uninsured motorist benefits” (Matter of Midwest Mut. Ins. Co. v. Pisani, 250 A.D.2d 512, 513, 673 N.Y.S.2d 126).
Additionally, the Supreme Court correctly denied the appellant's request for a hearing on the issue of whether the offending vehicle was insured on the date of the collision. The appellant's unsubstantiated conjecture that there may have been some defect in the cancellation of the policy covering the offending vehicle did not warrant a hearing on the issue (see, Matter of Eagle Ins. Co. v. Battershield, 225 A.D.2d 545, 638 N.Y.S.2d 758).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 01, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)