Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Stacy MARS, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), rendered September 1, 1998, convicting her of reckless endangerment in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was charged with the shooting death of her estranged husband. On the tape of her telephone call to the 911 emergency number, the defendant can be heard calling the name of another man. The court admitted into evidence love letters written by the defendant to this other man, which had been discovered by the victim several weeks before the shooting. The court properly determined that the letters served as background information in that they aided the jury in understanding the relationship between the defendant and the victim, as well as events surrounding the commission of the crime (see, People v. Till, 87 N.Y.2d 835, 637 N.Y.S.2d 681, 661 N.E.2d 153; People v. Montanez, 41 N.Y.2d 53, 390 N.Y.S.2d 861, 359 N.E.2d 371; People v. Gines, 36 N.Y.2d 932, 373 N.Y.S.2d 543, 335 N.E.2d 850). The letters were also probative of the defendant's motive to disregard the “substantial and unjustifiable risk” of death posed by her conduct (Penal Law § 15.05[3]; see, Penal Law § 125.15[1]; People v. Flayhart, 72 N.Y.2d 737, 536 N.Y.S.2d 727, 533 N.E.2d 657).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 08, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)