Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Leo YOUNG, Appellant.
Appeal from an order of the County Court of Essex County (Halloran, J.), entered December 30, 2005, which classified defendant as a risk level III sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
In 1988, defendant pleaded guilty in New Hampshire to aggravated felonious sexual assault stemming from his abuse of his then 14-year-old stepdaughter. After serving his sentence and relocating to Essex County, a hearing was conducted in order to determine defendant's risk level status. County Court classified defendant as a risk level III sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art. 6-C). Defendant appeals and we affirm.
A properly completed risk assessment instrument was submitted by the People and considered by the classifying court (see People v. Sass, 27 A.D.3d 968, 969, 812 N.Y.S.2d 150 [2006] ). The record reveals that County Court reviewed all of the relevant evidence and made a final determination based upon clear and convincing evidence. While defendant asserts that his plea to the 1988 indictment was not sufficient to support a conclusion that he engaged in sexual intercourse with his stepdaughter, we disagree. The “ acknowledgment of rights” executed by him on June 14, 1988, co-signed by his counsel, contains his admission that he “committed the acts charged in the indictment and that [he] intended to do so.” As this was his second felony conviction for sexual assault, the first being seven years prior with the same victim, we find County Court's numerical scoring on the various factors in the risk assessment instrument to be properly supported.
We have considered defendant's additional ascriptions of error and find them to be without merit.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.
PETERS, J.
MERCURE, J.P., CREW III, MUGGLIN and KANE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 12, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)