Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Carlos MAULEON, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which directed that petitioner be placed in administrative segregation.
While petitioner was confined at Elmira Correctional Facility in Chemung County, a recommendation was made that he be placed in administrative segregation because he was suspected of having committed a homicide at another correctional facility and had a history of extorting other inmates. Following a hearing, a determination was rendered placing him in administrative segregation “for the safety and security of the facility,” and the determination was upheld on administrative appeal, prompting the commencement of this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
Initially, we note that petitioner did not contest his actual placement in administrative segregation at the hearing, but conceded that it was necessary for his own protection. His real dispute appears to be with the grounds upon which the determination was based. Consequently, it appears that the appropriate remedy would be to seek the removal of the allegedly erroneous information from his inmate records (see 7 NYCRR 5.50 et seq.). In any event, to the extent that the petition itself may be construed as challenging the determination placing him in administrative segregation instead of protective custody, we find that substantial evidence, consisting of petitioner's testimony and the confidential information considered and independently assessed by the Hearing Officer for credibility and reliability, supports the determination at issue (see Matter of Blake v. Selsky, 10 A.D.3d 774, 775, 781 N.Y.S.2d 802 [2004]; Matter of Rosales v. Goord, 265 A.D.2d 713, 713-714, 697 N.Y.S.2d 182 [1999], lv. denied 94 N.Y.2d 758, 705 N.Y.S.2d 5, 726 N.E.2d 482 [2000] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 25, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)