Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Edgar FELICIANO, Appellant, v. COPSTAT SECURITY CORPORATION et al., Respondents. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed February 28, 2005, which ruled that claimant did not sustain a causally related disability and denied his claim for workers' compensation benefits.
Claimant, a security dispatcher, suffered various injuries during a motor vehicle accident and thereafter submitted a claim for workers' compensation benefits. Following several hearings, a Workers' Compensation Law Judge (hereinafter WCLJ) disallowed the claim, finding that, although claimant had sustained work-related injuries to his neck and back, there was no medical evidence demonstrating that said injuries resulted in any disability. In so holding, the WCLJ precluded Sherwood Jacobson, claimant's treating neurologist, and Bonnie Glassman, claimant's treating chiropractor, from testifying and struck their medical reports from the record based upon their repeated failure to appear for scheduled hearings. The Workers' Compensation Board upheld the WCLJ's decision and this appeal ensued.
We affirm. A review of the record reveals that Jacobson and Glassman each failed to appear to give testimony on two separate occasions, despite having been given due notice of the scheduled hearings and, indeed, having been served with subpoenas relative to their respective second hearings. Further, the record is devoid of any showing of “extraordinary circumstances” accounting for their nonappearances at the second hearings (12 NYCRR 300.10[c] ). Jacobson offered no explanation whatsoever for his absence and, although Glassman did send a letter after the fact advising as to her future availability to testify, she offered no justification as to why she had not previously been available. Thus, we cannot conclude that the Board erred in upholding the WCLJ's resolution of the claim without testimony from Jacobson and Glassman (see 12 NYCRR 300.10[c] ). Moreover, inasmuch as their testimony was precluded, their medical reports could not be relied upon (see Matter of Musa v. Nassau County Police Dept., 276 A.D.2d 851, 852, 714 N.Y.S.2d 545 [2000]; Matter of Christiano v. Wakefern Food Corp., 269 A.D.2d 651, 651, 703 N.Y.S.2d 292 [2000]; Matter of Bozier v. A & P Shopwell, 263 A.D.2d 631, 632, 692 N.Y.S.2d 837 [1999], lv. dismissed 94 N.Y.2d 814, 701 N.Y.S.2d 706, 723 N.E.2d 561 [1999] ).
Claimant's remaining contentions, including his assertion that the Board's decision should be overturned in the interest of justice, have been examined and found to be unavailing.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
PETERS, J.
CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, SPAIN and KANE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 25, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)