Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Arthur PRUITT, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (DeRiggi, J.), rendered March 14, 2001, convicting him of rape in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The County Court's Sandoval ruling (see People v. Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371, 378, 357 N.Y.S.2d 849, 314 N.E.2d 413) was a provident exercise of its discretion (see People v. Mitchell, 298 A.D.2d 602, 748 N.Y.S.2d 689; People v. Williams, 292 A.D.2d 474, 475, 740 N.Y.S.2d 348).
The County Court properly admitted the testimony of the People's expert witness, as it was based on his specialized knowledge and was helpful in aiding the jury to reach its verdict (see People v. Brown, 97 N.Y.2d 500, 505, 743 N.Y.S.2d 374, 769 N.E.2d 1266; People v. Cronin, 60 N.Y.2d 430, 433, 470 N.Y.S.2d 110, 458 N.E.2d 351).
Additionally, the defendant was not unduly prejudiced by the fact that he was shackled during his testimony. The court placed a paper wrapping around the desk where the defendant testified so that his waist and hands were not visible to the jurors (see People v. Bailey, 205 A.D.2d 789, 613 N.Y.S.2d 692; People v. Tedesco, 143 A.D.2d 155, 159, 531 N.Y.S.2d 609). In any event, it was the defendant's own violent behavior which made it necessary that he be shackled, and the court minimized any potential prejudice by issuing the appropriate instruction to the jury (see People v. Benito, 256 A.D.2d 221, 683 N.Y.S.2d 27, lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 850, 688 N.Y.S.2d 498, 710 N.E.2d 1097, cert. denied 528 U.S. 810, 120 S.Ct. 42, 145 L.Ed.2d 38; People v. Bailey, supra).
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Castaldi, 24 A.D.3d 567, 806 N.Y.S.2d 684).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 11, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)