Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Khasim Usama Kenyetta LaVAN, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with making threats, interfering with an employee, harassment and creating a disturbance. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of creating a disturbance and harassment. On administrative appeal, respondent dismissed the harassment charge and reduced the penalty imposed. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
The hearing transcript is incomplete. The testimony of at least one witness, a correction officer, is missing entirely, as are any closing comments by petitioner. Petitioner asserts that the testimony of this correction officer supports his defense. The absence of a potentially significant portion of the transcript precludes meaningful review (see Matter of Douglas v. Goord, 24 A.D.3d 922, 923, 806 N.Y.S.2d 270 [2005]; Matter of Allen v. Goord, 14 A.D.3d 961, 962, 788 N.Y.S.2d 511 [2005]; compare Matter of Daniels v. Goord, 31 A.D.3d 1076, 1077, 819 N.Y.S.2d 205 [2006] ). Accordingly, we annul the Commissioner's determination and remit for a new hearing on the one remaining charge.
ADJUDGED that the determination is annulled, without costs, petition granted and matter remitted to the Commissioner of Correctional Services for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 24, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)