Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
FIRST NATIONWIDE BANK, Appellant, v. Amarante PRETEL, a/k/a Amaranto DePretel, et al., Respondents.
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated June 21, 1996, as, upon its motion for summary judgment, dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendants Amarante Pretel, First American Title Insurance Company of New York, Mela Alio, and “John” Alio, as abandoned, as the plaintiff had failed to seek leave to enter a timely default judgment against them.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as it is asserted against Amarante Pretel, First American Title Insurance Company of New York, Mela Alio, and “John” Alio.
Where a plaintiff fails to seek leave to enter a default judgment within one year after the default (CPLR 3215[c] ), he or she must offer a reasonable excuse for the delay and demonstrate that the complaint is meritorious (see, Manago v. Giorlando, 143 A.D.2d 646, 533 N.Y.S.2d 106). The plaintiff has met the standard in this case. The record contains absolutely no evidence to dispute the plaintiff's claim that the defendant, Amarante Pretel, defaulted on the mortgage in February 1986. Further, the existence of settlement discussions with Pretel constituted a reasonable excuse for the plaintiff's failure to seek leave to enter a judgment (see, Katz v. Knoesel Serv. Center, 117 A.D.2d 781, 499 N.Y.S.2d 107). Finally, there is no indication in the record that the defendants were in any way prejudiced by the plaintiff's delay (see, Katz v. Knoesel Serv. Center, supra).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 23, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)