Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Edward G. MUNDINGER, et al., Appellants, v. Edward L. CLARK, et al., Respondents.
In action to recover damages, inter alia, for a breach of a shareholders agreement, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated July 15, 1996, which, inter alia, denied their application to, among other things, enjoin the defendants from proceeding with a warrant of eviction.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the plaintiffs that the letter of the defendants Edward L. Clark and Alba B. Clark dated July 21, 1995, setting forth new terms to the May 1, 1995, stipulation of settlement constituted a repudiation of the stipulation (see, Sunshine Steak, Salad & Seafood v. W.I.M. Realty, 135 A.D.2d 891, 522 N.Y.S.2d 292). However, the plaintiffs did not seek rescission but instead elected to hold the Clarks to the original stipulation of settlement and demanded performance in accordance with it. Thus, the plaintiffs kept the stipulation agreement alive for the benefit of both parties, so that either party could take advantage of supervening events (see, Rubber Trading Co. v. Manhattan Rubber Mfg. Co., 221 N.Y. 120, 126, 116 N.E. 789; Matter of Badstein, 225 A.D.2d 691, 640 N.Y.S.2d 141; Hadfield v. Colter, 188 A.D. 563, 577, 177 N.Y.S. 382; cf., Matthews v. Bearce, 65 A.D.2d 853, 410 N.Y.S.2d 166). The plaintiffs, by failing to vacate the premises on the agreed-upon date of July 31, 1995, breached the stipulation of settlement, and therefore may not now seek to rescind the stipulation of settlement based on the Clarks' anticipatory breach.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 30, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)