Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Floyd COWART, Petitioner, v. Jose PICO, as Superintendent of Green Haven Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which directed that petitioner be placed in administrative segregation.
Substantial evidence supports the determination that petitioner, a prison inmate, posed a threat to the safety and security of the facility sufficient to require his placement in administrative segregation (see, 7 NYCRR 301.4 [b] ). Presented in evidence was the testimony of correction officers who described the tension that prevailed at the facility following the announcement that double-bunking of inmates was imminent and that petitioner had been heard averring that he would never be housed in a double cell and would “do whatever it takes” to prevent such a situation. The officers further stated that petitioner had circulated among various inmate factions in the prison yard in an apparent attempt to organize resistance to the anticipated double-bunking policy. The officers also described a previous incident during which petitioner had been an instigator of dissension at the facility. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the determination that petitioner posed a threat to the safety and security of the facility (see generally, Matter of Francella v. Selsky, 236 A.D.2d 749, 751, 654 N.Y.S.2d 431, 432). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 17, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)