Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Luis ALVARADO, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.), rendered February 9, 1998, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.
On July 3, 1995 at Gouverneur Correctional Facility in St. Lawrence County, a number of Hispanic inmates severely beat an African-American inmate, leaving him unconscious. Defendant and Jose Torres (see, People v. Torres, 258 A.D.2d 824, 687 N.Y.S.2d 187) were later identified to be among the inmates involved in the incident. Both defendant and Torres were ultimately indicted for assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. Notably, however, no count of the indictment was based upon an “acting in concert” theory (see, People v. Dlugash, 41 N.Y.2d 725, 731, 395 N.Y.S.2d 419, 363 N.E.2d 1155). During their joint trial, a correction officer testified that he saw defendant striking the victim with a 10-pound free weight in the back of the head. Testimony also revealed that Torres hit the victim from behind with a weight bar. Defendant was found guilty of all counts and now asserts that the trial evidence was legally insufficient and that the jury verdict was against the weight of the credible evidence.
Upon our review, we find meritorious defendant's contention that the trial evidence was legally insufficient to support the jury's determination that his conduct was the direct cause of the victim's injury (see, People v. Darrow, 260 A.D.2d 928, 691 N.Y.S.2d 189). While we are constrained by People v. Darrow (supra) to conclude that the conviction of assault in the first degree cannot stand, we remain authorized to modify the judgment (see, CPL 470.15 [2] [a] ) upon our conclusion that, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People, it was sufficient to establish the lesser included offense of attempted assault in the first degree (see, CPL 1.20[37]; Penal Law § 110.00; People v. Santos, 213 A.D.2d 302, 624 N.Y.S.2d 154, affd. 86 N.Y.2d 869, 635 N.Y.S.2d 168, 658 N.E.2d 1041).
We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and find them without merit.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing defendant's conviction of the crime of assault in the first degree to the crime of attempted assault in the first degree; matter remitted to the County Court of St. Lawrence County for resentencing on that count only; and, as so modified, affirmed.
PETERS, J.
CARDONA, P.J., SPAIN, CARPINELLO and GRAFFEO, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 10, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)