Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Frank W. DEARSTYNE Jr., Appellant, v. RENSSELAER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al., Respondents.
Appeals (1) from an order of the County Court of Rensselaer County (McGrath, J.), entered December 15, 1997, which denied petitioner's motions pursuant to CPLR 2307 and 2302(b) for the issuance of judicial subpoenas duces tecum, and (2) from an order of said court, entered March 6, 1998, which denied petitioner's motion for reconsideration.
Petitioner, proceeding pro se, moved for the issuance of judicial subpoenas duces tecum directing respondents to turn over papers and records petitioner believed relevant to his previous conviction for various crimes (see, People v. Dearstyne, 230 A.D.2d 953, 646 N.Y.S.2d 1000, lv. denied, 89 N.Y.2d 921, 654 N.Y.S.2d 723, 677 N.E.2d 295). He sought this information for use in support of a CPL 440.10 motion which he contemplated bringing. County Court denied the motion. We affirm.
Except in narrowly defined circumstances, not present here, for a judicial subpoena to issue there must be a pending underlying action or proceeding (see, Matter of Plater v. Cortland Mem. Hosp., 256 A.D.2d 678, 678-679, 681 N.Y.S.2d 139, 140; see also, Siegel, Practice Commentary, McKinney's Cons.Laws of N.Y., Book 7B, C2301:4, at 236). As there was none at the time petitioner sought to compel production of the documents, petitioner was not entitled to the relief requested. Moreover, a review of the record confirms County Court's conclusion that petitioner failed to meet his burden of demonstrating how the information inquired after was material and relevant (see, People v. Carpenter, 240 A.D.2d 863, 864, 658 N.Y.S.2d 542, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 902, 663 N.Y.S.2d 514, 686 N.E.2d 226). Regarding petitioner's motion for reconsideration, also denied by County Court, that was actually a motion for reargument and hence the denial is not appealable (see, Guntert v. Daniels, 240 A.D.2d 789, 791, 658 N.Y.S.2d 521).
ORDERED that the order entered December 15, 1997 is affirmed, without costs.
ORDERED that the appeal from the order entered March 6, 1998 is dismissed, without costs.
YESAWICH JR., J.
MIKOLL, J.P., CREW III, PETERS and CARPINELLO, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 10, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)