Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY (GEICO), respondent, v. Kimberly J. YARMOLUK, appellant.
In a proceeding to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, Kimberly J. Yarmoluk appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated August 31, 1998, which granted the petition.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The respondent was traveling on Route 55 in the Town of Poughkeepsie when her car struck debris in the road, an automobile muffler, which caused her to lose control of her car and swerve into a guardrail, resulting in her sustaining personal injuries. We agree with the Supreme Court that under these circumstances, there was no physical contact with an uninsured motor vehicle to support a claim for uninsured motorist coverage. “ ‘Physical contact’ occurs when the accident originates in collision with an uninsured vehicle, or an integral part of an uninsured vehicle” (Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Killakey, 78 N.Y.2d 325, 329, 574 N.Y.S.2d 927, 580 N.E.2d 399). In addition, the burden of proving a claim when only a part of a vehicle is involved is substantial, and “to establish that the claim originated in collision * * * the claimant must prove that the detached part, in an unbroken chain of events, caused the accident” (Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Killakey, supra, at 329, 574 N.Y.S.2d 927, 580 N.E.2d 399). In light of the fact that no one witnessed the muffler actually fall off any vehicle and the absence of any proof as to how long the muffler had been in the roadway, we find that the appellant failed to meet this burden (cf., Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Killakey, supra).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 21, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)