Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Christopher VELEZ, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules which prohibit possessing unauthorized organizational materials and of disobeying facility correspondence procedures. According to the misbehavior report, petitioner was found to be in possession of, inter alia, unauthorized organizational materials, including a “call to arms” letter advocating gang violence. The determination of guilt was affirmed upon administrative appeal. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
Initially, we find that petitioner waived any issue concerning the adequacy of the misbehavior report to give notice of the nature of the charges against him by failing to raise this issue at the hearing (see, Matter of Campanale v. Coughlin, 214 A.D.2d 902, 626 N.Y.S.2d 287). Turning to petitioner's evidentiary challenge, we conclude that the misbehavior report, combined with the letters themselves and the reporting officer's testimony, provide substantial evidence of his guilt (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477). Any disputes as to credibility were properly resolved by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Johnson v. Barkley, 260 A.D.2d 882, 689 N.Y.S.2d 537).
Finally, we have examined petitioner's remaining arguments, including his claim of Hearing Officer bias, and, to the extent they have been preserved for appellate review, find them to be unpersuasive.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 24, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)