Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
James GRAHAM, etc., appellant, v. WEST BABYLON UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., respondents.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated May 20, 1998, which, upon an in camera inspection of the school disciplinary records of the defendant Marc Maggio, denied that branch of his motion which was to compel the unsealing and disclosure of the records at issue.
ORDERED that the order is modified by deleting therefrom the provision which denied that branch of the motion which was to unseal and disclose the requested disciplinary records, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion to the extent of unsealing and disclosing those records pertaining to an incident which occurred on January 27, 1994, redacted to omit the identity of the other person involved therein, and otherwise denying that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff.
School records such as those sought by the plaintiff ordinarily are not protected by any privilege, and they are generally discoverable once their relevancy and materiality to the action are established (see generally, Davis v. Elandem Realty Co., 226 A.D.2d 419, 641 N.Y.S.2d 72; Wepy v. Shen, 175 A.D.2d 124, 571 N.Y.S.2d 817; Baldwin v. Franklin Gen. Hosp., 151 A.D.2d 532, 542 N.Y.S.2d 667). Moreover, records of any past instances of violent and assaultive behavior on the part of the defendant Marc Maggio clearly would be relevant to the plaintiff's claim that the defendant West Babylon Union Free School District failed to adequately supervise Maggio (see generally, Mirand v. City of New York, 84 N.Y.2d 44, 614 N.Y.S.2d 372, 637 N.E.2d 263; Kennedy v. Seaford Union Free School Dist. No. 6, 250 A.D.2d 574, 672 N.Y.S.2d 407). Accordingly, having reviewed the school disciplinary records at issue, we conclude that the Supreme Court should have directed the unsealing and disclosure, in appropriately redacted form, of those records pertaining to an incident which occurred on January 27, 1994 (see, e.g., Moores v. City of Newburgh School Dist., 213 A.D.2d 527, 623 N.Y.S.2d 911).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 28, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)