Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. James FARR, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.), rendered June 17, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree, attempted assault in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contentions, his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree is not a concurrent inclusory count of either the conviction of murder in the second degree or attempted assault in the first degree (see, People v. Pons, 68 N.Y.2d 264, 508 N.Y.S.2d 403, 501 N.E.2d 11; People v. Almodovar, 62 N.Y.2d 126, 130, 476 N.Y.S.2d 95, 464 N.E.2d 463; People v. Glover, 57 N.Y.2d 61, 453 N.Y.S.2d 660, 439 N.E.2d 376; People v. Green, 56 N.Y.2d 427, 452 N.Y.S.2d 389, 437 N.E.2d 1146; People v. Perez, 45 N.Y.2d 204, 408 N.Y.S.2d 343, 380 N.E.2d 174; People v. Mitchell, 216 A.D.2d 863, 628 N.Y.S.2d 914; People v. Laboy, 208 A.D.2d 954, 618 N.Y.S.2d 86; People v. Lee, 196 A.D.2d 509, 601 N.Y.S.2d 20; People v. Sykes, 194 A.D.2d 502, 599 N.Y.S.2d 566; People v. McGriff, 123 A.D.2d 646, 506 N.Y.S.2d 910; People v. Davis, 95 A.D.2d 837, 463 N.Y.S.2d 876).
The trial court properly denied the defendant's request for a missing witness charge, since the record demonstrates that the witnesses in question were not knowledgeable about any material issue (see, People v. Kitching, 78 N.Y.2d 532, 577 N.Y.S.2d 231, 583 N.E.2d 944; People v. Gonzalez, 68 N.Y.2d 424, 509 N.Y.S.2d 796, 502 N.E.2d 583).
The defendant's claim that his case was unduly prejudiced when the Trial Judge permitted the victim's wife to testify while her child was seated on her lap, is equally without merit (see, People v. Ortiz, 54 N.Y.2d 288, 292, 445 N.Y.S.2d 116, 429 N.E.2d 794; People v. Yut Wai Tom, 53 N.Y.2d 44, 439 N.Y.S.2d 896, 422 N.E.2d 556; People v. Caballero, 242 A.D.2d 337, 661 N.Y.S.2d 980; People v. Caban, 224 A.D.2d 705, 638 N.Y.S.2d 966; People v. Hayden, 221 A.D.2d 367, 368, 633 N.Y.S.2d 375; People v. Robinson, 137 A.D.2d 564, 524 N.Y.S.2d 304).
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 28, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)