Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Wilson RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. Leonard A. PORTUONDO, as Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Following a disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits fighting. Included in the evidence presented at the hearing were the misbehavior report and testimony from the correction officer who wrote it. The officer testified that he had observed petitioner engaged “in an obvious fight” with another inmate and that although the fight was quickly broken up, petitioner nonetheless sustained multiple abrasions and a ripped shirt. Petitioner and the other inmate involved in the incident gave contrary testimony, asserting that the correction officer must have misinterpreted a friendly session of horseplay for a serious fight.
Substantial evidence supports the determination of petitioner's guilt in the form of the misbehavior report and the testimony of the reporting correction officer who witnessed the charged misconduct (see, Matter of Burr v. Goord, 287 A.D.2d 931, 731 N.Y.S.2d 786; Matter of Lunney v. Selsky, 275 A.D.2d 820, 713 N.Y.S.2d 300). The exculpatory evidence presented by petitioner raised an issue of credibility that the Hearing Officer was free to resolve against him in the exercise of his discretion (see, Matter of Acevedo v. Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility, 265 A.D.2d 763, 697 N.Y.S.2d 703). The remaining contentions raised in this proceeding have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 20, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)