Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Bennie GIBSON, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered September 21, 2000, convicting him of possession of burglar's tools, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the plea is vacated, the indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.
The Supreme Court failed to ensure that the defendant, before pleading guilty, had a full understanding of what the plea connoted and its consequences (see Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 244, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274; People v. Ford, 86 N.Y.2d 397, 402-403, 633 N.Y.S.2d 270, 657 N.E.2d 265; People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 19, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170). In addition, the court failed to apprise the defendant that he was giving up any rights upon entering the plea, such as the right to a jury trial, the right to confront his accusers, and the privilege against self-incrimination (see generally Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 243, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274). Thus, while “[t]he court is not required to engage in any particular litany when allocuting the defendant,” here, the record was not clear that “the plea represent[ed] a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action open to the defendant” (People v. Ford, 86 N.Y.2d 397, 403, 633 N.Y.S.2d 270, 657 N.E.2d 265 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 31, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162; Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 243, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274).
Since the defendant has completed his sentence and the remaining counts of the indictment only involve relatively minor offenses, a dismissal of the indictment is warranted (see People v. Flynn, 79 N.Y.2d 879, 882, 581 N.Y.S.2d 160, 589 N.E.2d 383; People v. Burwell, 53 N.Y.2d 849, 851, 440 N.Y.S.2d 177, 422 N.E.2d 822; People v. Simmons, 32 N.Y.2d 250, 253, 344 N.Y.S.2d 897, 298 N.E.2d 76; People v. Campbell, 269 A.D.2d 460, 461, 703 N.Y.S.2d 498; cf. People v. Allen, 39 N.Y.2d 916, 917-918, 386 N.Y.S.2d 404, 352 N.E.2d 591).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 05, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)