Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Gus D. PLAKAS, et al., respondents, v. ANGEL AERIAL CORP., et al., appellants.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), dated December 18, 2006, as, upon renewal, adhered to its original determination in an order dated July 13, 2006, granting the plaintiffs' motion pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, upon renewal, the order dated July 13, 2006, is vacated, the motion to permanently stay arbitration is denied, and the parties are directed to proceed to arbitration.
While this action was pending, the plaintiffs and the defendants entered into a written agreement to arbitrate the claims which are the subject of this lawsuit. However, the plaintiffs subsequently moved to permanently stay the arbitration. Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the plaintiffs could not unilaterally decide that they no longer wanted the very relief to which they agreed simply because the arbitration agreement contained a boilerplate provision applicable to all cases which required the payment of administrative fees to the arbitrator upon the parties' adjournment or cancellation of the arbitration (see Massie v. Crawford, 289 A.D.2d 66, 67, 734 N.Y.S.2d 40). Additionally, paragraph (iv) of the agreement, which requires the discontinuance of all pending litigation upon the arbitrator's determination, did not negate or modify paragraph (iii) of the agreement binding the parties to the arbitrator's decision (id.). Accordingly, upon renewal, the Supreme Court erred in adhering to its original determination granting the plaintiffs' motion to permanently stay the arbitration of the issues of liability and damages pursuant to the written arbitration agreement of the parties.
The plaintiffs' remaining contention is without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 22, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)