Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Andrew M. PRATT, Appellant.
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano Jr., J.), entered October 6, 2004, which denied defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.20 to set aside the sentence following his conviction of the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree, without a hearing.
In satisfaction of a multiple-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of sexual abuse in the first degree and was sentenced to a prison term of seven years, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. On appeal, this Court affirmed defendant's conviction (303 A.D.2d 843, 755 N.Y.S.2d 339 [2003], lv. denied 99 N.Y.2d 657, 760 N.Y.S.2d 122, 790 N.E.2d 296 [2003] ). Subsequently, defendant moved pursuant to CPL 440.20 to set aside his sentence, arguing that the imposition of a period of postrelease supervision was unauthorized and illegal because the crime to which he pleaded guilty was committed prior to September 1, 1998, the effective date of Penal Law § 70.45. County Court denied the motion without a hearing, prompting this appeal.
Initially, given defendant's opportunity to challenge the legality of his sentence on his direct appeal and the availability of the facts and information relevant to this issue at that time, County Court's denial of defendant's motion was not improper (see People v. O'Hanlon, 13 A.D.3d 718, 719, 785 N.Y.S.2d 795 [2004] ). Additionally, we discern no abuse of discretion in the court's denial of defendant's motion without a hearing. Defendant failed to submit any evidence other than his own affidavit in support of his claim that the conduct to which he pleaded guilty occurred prior to September 1, 1998, rather than during “Summer, 1998”-which could include dates subsequent to September 1, 1998-as alleged in the indictment. More importantly, the circumstances surrounding the case, as evidenced in the People's submissions, indicate that such conduct did indeed occur in September 1998 (see CPL 440.30[4][d]; People v. Sayles, 17 A.D.3d 924, 924-925, 794 N.Y.S.2d 160 [2005], lv. denied 5 N.Y.3d 794, 801 N.Y.S.2d 815, 835 N.E.2d 675 [2005] ).
ORDERED that the order is affirmed.
CARPINELLO, J.
CARDONA, P.J., PETERS, SPAIN and KANE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 10, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)