Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Corey FORD, Petitioner, v. Joseph SMITH, as Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits smuggling any item in or out of the correctional facility. The charges stem from an incident in the visiting room wherein petitioner was observed sliding a piece of paper to his visitor, who then read it and placed it in her purse. The paper was later discovered to have a name, phone number and Social Security number printed on it. Petitioner admitted that he did not have prior authorization to exchange any written information with his visitor. We are unpersuaded by petitioner's contention that there were any significant gaps in the hearing transcript which would preclude meaningful judicial review (see Matter of Michaelides v. Goord, 300 A.D.2d 718, 719, 749 N.Y.S.2d 906 [2002]; Matter of Kalid v. Farrell, 284 A.D.2d 603, 603, 725 N.Y.S.2d 583 [2001] ). To that end, the misbehavior report, supporting memoranda, testimony at the hearing and videotape of the incident provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Brown v. Goord, 9 A.D.3d 646, 779 N.Y.S.2d 651 [2004], lv. denied 3 N.Y.3d 612, 788 N.Y.S.2d 667, 821 N.E.2d 972 [2004] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent that they are properly before this Court, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 10, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)