Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Hafani FEWS, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
A search of petitioner's prison cell recovered gang-related letters and a steel-threaded rod with tape at one end. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of unauthorized organizational materials and possession of a weapon. A tier III disciplinary hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty of both charges. Upon administrative appeal, that determination was affirmed with a modified penalty. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment. We now confirm.
To the extent that petitioner challenges the determination of guilt as being predicated on insufficient evidence, we disagree. Petitioner pleaded guilty to possession of unauthorized organizational materials and, thus, cannot challenge the part of the determination sustaining that charge (see Matter of Figueroa v. Selsky, 49 A.D.3d 1059, 1059, 853 N.Y.S.2d 443 [2008], lv. denied 10 N.Y.3d 714, 861 N.Y.S.2d 274, 891 N.E.2d 309 [2008] ). As for the portion of the determination finding petitioner guilty of possession of a weapon, it is supported by substantial evidence consisting of the detailed misbehavior report and corroborating hearing testimony from the correction officers who conducted the cell search (see Matter of Shakur v. Smith, 34 A.D.3d 898, 899, 822 N.Y.S.2d 741 [2006] ). Petitioner's assertion that the weapon was not his and was planted by either a correction officer or member of a rival gang created a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Stolpinski v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 32 A.D.3d 1091, 1091, 820 N.Y.S.2d 861 [2006] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be unavailing.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: September 11, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)