Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Andrew CRANDALL, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, challenges the determination finding him guilty of possessing contraband classified as a weapon. The charges stemmed from a manila envelope found, which petitioner admitted belonged to him, containing a razor-type weapon. The misbehavior report, authored by a correction officer who witnessed the event, together with the testimony offered from the correction officers involved in the incident, provides substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Norman v. Wood, 261 A.D.2d 755, 691 N.Y.S.2d 204; Evans v. Goord, 256 A.D.2d 695, 681 N.Y.S.2d 798; Matter of Blanche v. Selsky, 253 A.D.2d 944, 678 N.Y.S.2d 915). Furthermore, it was a credibility issue properly before the Hearing Officer to assess petitioner's claim that he mistakenly identified the envelope as his own (see, Matter of Alvarado v. Goord, 252 A.D.2d 650, 675 N.Y.S.2d 220). We find nothing in the record to support petitioner's assertion that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the outcome of the hearing flowed from the alleged bias (see, Matter of Monge v. Goord, 251 A.D.2d 804, 674 N.Y.S.2d 792; Matter of Applegate v. Coombe, 237 A.D.2d 836, 656 N.Y.S.2d 949, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 803, 661 N.Y.S.2d 179, 683 N.E.2d 1053). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 06, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)