Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony MARIANO, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Clinton County (McGill, J.), rendered September 5, 1997, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of three counts of the crime of burglary in the second degree.
On September 5, 1997, defendant entered a plea of guilty to three counts of burglary in the second degree and was, thereafter, sentenced as a second violent felony offender to concurrent determinate prison terms of 10 years on each count.
Defendant does not challenge the severity of his sentence but rather that the underlying reference to defendant as a second violent felony offender was erroneous. We agree. Although defendant did not raise this issue prior to sentencing, it appears that he was improperly sentenced as a second violent felony offender based upon a conviction for criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, which occurred approximately 10 months after the commission of the burglaries. Consequently, this criminal possession of stolen property conviction could not form the basis for sentencing defendant as a second violent felony offender, since it is not a sentence for a violent crime committed before the commission of the present felony (see, Penal Law § 70.06[1][b][ii] ). Accordingly, defendant is entitled to be resentenced (see, People v. Hunt, 148 A.D.2d 836, 539 N.Y.S.2d 109, lv. denied 74 N.Y.2d 665, 543 N.Y.S.2d 407, 541 N.E.2d 436). The judgment of conviction must, therefore, be modified by vacating the sentence imposed and the matter remitted to County Court for defendant's resentencing.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; matter remitted to the County Court of Clinton County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this court's decision; and, as so modified, affirmed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 13, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)