Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Neron DOZIER, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
In connection with the search of his cell, petitioner was charged in two misbehavior reports with numerous prison disciplinary rule violations. The first report indicated that petitioner refused a correction officer's directive to stand in a certain location so that the search could proceed and struck the officer with a clenched fist resulting in a struggle that ended with petitioner being placed in restraints. The report charged him with refusing a direct order, assaulting staff and engaging in violent conduct. The second report related that, during the cell search, items consisting of, among other things, a toothbrush with a sharpened handle and latex glove fingers filled with tobacco and rolling papers were recovered. That report charged him with possessing a weapon, possessing contraband, possessing an altered item and smuggling. A tier III disciplinary hearing on the charges contained in both misbehavior reports was subsequently conducted. At the conclusion of the hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all of the charges, except for possessing contraband. After the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, he commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
We confirm. The misbehavior reports, hearing testimony and documentary evidence provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Lopez v. Goord, 49 A.D.3d 1044, 1045, 853 N.Y.S.2d 706 [2008], lv. denied 11 N.Y.3d 703, 864 N.Y.S.2d 807, 894 N.E.2d ---- [Sept. 4, 2008]; Matter of Green v. Goord, 26 A.D.3d 562, 563, 807 N.Y.S.2d 729 [2006] ). Petitioner's contrary testimony and that of his inmate witnesses presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Ohnmacht v. Goord, 47 A.D.3d 1030, 1031, 850 N.Y.S.2d 245 [2008], appeal dismissed 10 N.Y.3d 954, 863 N.Y.S.2d 138, 893 N.E.2d 444 [2008]; Matter of Thomas v. Goord, 34 A.D.3d 1143, 1144, 824 N.Y.S.2d 495 [2006] ). His remaining contentions are either unpreserved for our review or are lacking in merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 11, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)