Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Janine DONOHUE, appellant, v. L. DeLEA & SONS, INC., et al., defendants, DeLea Leasing Corp., et al., respondents.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J.), entered June 6, 2007, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants DeLea Leasing Corp., East Northport Equipment Corp., DeLea Landscaping Supplies, Inc., and DeLea Sod Farms, which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant DeLea Leasing Corp. and denied her cross motion, among other things, for summary judgment on the issue of liability against the defendant DeLea Leasing Corp.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff allegedly was injured while operating a truck in the course of her employment. The truck was leased to the plaintiff's employer by the defendant DeLea Leasing Corp. (hereinafter the owner). The plaintiff commenced this action against, among others, her employer and the owner. The Supreme Court granted the employer's motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it, based on the exclusivity of the Workers' Compensation Law. The complaint asserts, in pertinent part, that the owner negligently failed to inspect, maintain, and repair the truck. The owner established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating, inter alia, that it was not responsible for the maintenance and repair of the truck, and the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition (see Delio v. Percom Equip. Rental Corp., 249 A.D.2d 354, 354-355, 671 N.Y.S.2d 109; Jaglall v. Supreme Petroleum Co. of N.J., 185 A.D.2d 971, 587 N.Y.S.2d 413; see also Rodriguez v. Lodato Rental, 267 A.D.2d 293, 701 N.Y.S.2d 83). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly awarded the owner summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
In light of our determination, the plaintiff's remaining contentions have been rendered academic.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 18, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)