Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
David GOLDSTEIN, appellant, v. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, respondent.
In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring the rights of the parties pursuant to a policy of disability insurance, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dollard, J.), dated August 22, 2005, as granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) as barred by the doctrine of res judicata and the statute of limitations.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Under the doctrine of res judicata, a disposition on the merits bars litigation between the same parties or those in privity with them of a cause of action arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions as a cause of action that either was raised or could have been raised in the prior proceeding (see Matter of Hunter, 4 N.Y.3d 260, 269, 794 N.Y.S.2d 286, 827 N.E.2d 269; Barbieri v. Bridge Funding, 5 A.D.3d 414, 415, 772 N.Y.S.2d 610). Here, the Supreme Court correctly dismissed the cause of action for a declaratory judgment on res judicata grounds as the plaintiff's claims were raised or could have been raised in the prior action which was disposed of on the merits (see Hubbell v. Trans World Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., 50 N.Y.2d 899, 430 N.Y.S.2d 589, 408 N.E.2d 918; CRK Contr. of Suffolk v. Brown & Assocs., 260 A.D.2d 530, 688 N.Y.S.2d 249).
The Supreme Court properly dismissed the remaining causes of action as time barred. The cause of action to recover damages for fraud is barred by the six-year statute of limitations (see CPLR 213[8] ). Further, the causes of action alleging intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, breach of duty, and bad faith are barred by the one-year statute of limitations for intentional torts to the extent that they allege intentional conduct (see CPLR 215), or the three-year statute of limitations governing personal injury claims insofar as they allege negligent conduct (see CPLR 214).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 12, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)