Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Kathleen A. SHELDON, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 16, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Claimant worked as a part-time waitress at a restaurant from February 1999 until December 2004. Thereafter, she applied for unemployment insurance benefits and a hearing was held on her claim. While the employer testified that claimant quit her job, claimant stated that she was unable to work due to a knee injury. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant now appeals.
We affirm. Resigning from a job due to a medical condition has been held not to constitute good cause for leaving employment absent evidence that the separation from employment was medically necessary (see Matter of Mercier [Commissioner of Labor], 296 A.D.2d 761, 744 N.Y.S.2d 776 [2002]; Matter of Krinsky [Sweeney], 238 A.D.2d 659, 655 N.Y.S.2d 678 [1997] ). Here, claimant admitted that she did not provide her employer with medical documentation establishing her inability to work due to her knee condition and, in fact, stated that her doctor did not tell her she could not work. In view of this, as well as the employer's testimony that claimant abruptly quit, substantial evidence supports the Board's decision.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 11, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)