Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: EVELYN MONCRIEFF G. (Anonymous). Lutheran Social Services of Metropolitan New York, Inc., et al., petitioners-respondents; Edmund Emerson G. (Anonymous), Sr., appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Elswith Patricia G. (Anonymous). Lutheran Social Services of Metropolitan New York, Inc., et al., petitioners-respondents; Edmund Emerson G. (Anonymous), Sr., appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 2) In the Matter of Clara Emerson G. (Anonymous). Lutheran Social Services of Metropolitan New York, Inc., et al., petitioners-respondents; Edmund Emerson G. (Anonymous), Sr., appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 3).
In three related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of three orders of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Salinitro, J.), each dated October 17, 2005 (one as to each child), as, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, terminated his parental rights, and transferred the guardianship and custody of the subject children to Lutheran Social Services of Metropolitan New York, Inc., and the Commissioner of Social Services for purposes of adoption.
ORDERED that the orders of fact-finding and disposition are affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court's findings as to the credibility, character, and temperament of the parent and other witnesses are to be accorded great deference (see Matter of Celenia R., 264 A.D.2d 737, 738, 695 N.Y.S.2d 301). The evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing supports the Family Court's findings of permanent neglect. It was established, by clear and convincing evidence, that the petitioner Lutheran Social Services of Metropolitan New York, Inc., made diligent attempts to strengthen the parent-child relationships, and that despite its efforts, the father failed to meaningfully plan for the future of the subject children (see Social Services Law § 384-b; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 140, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824; Matter of Ashey Lorraine R., 22 A.D.3d 671, 804 N.Y.S.2d 348; Matter of Pleasant Edward G., 306 A.D.2d 409, 761 N.Y.S.2d 484).
In addition, the evidence adduced at the dispositional hearing demonstrated that the subject children's best interests would be served by terminating the father's parental rights and freeing the children for adoption by their respective foster parents (see Matter of Ashey Lorraine R., supra; Matter of Marie J., 307 A.D.2d 265, 762 N.Y.S.2d 263; Matter of Precious Sarah B., 269 A.D.2d 393, 702 N.Y.S.2d 877).
The father's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 31, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)