Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ralph IORIO, et al., appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., respondents.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated June 1, 2004, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability and granted the defendants' cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
A plaintiff cannot prevail on causes of action to recover damages for false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution against police officers if the police officers had probable cause to believe that the plaintiff committed the underlying crime (see Gisondi v. Town of Harrison, 72 N.Y.2d 280, 283, 532 N.Y.S.2d 234, 528 N.E.2d 157; Wasilewicz v. Village of Monroe Police Dept., 3 A.D.3d 561, 771 N.Y.S.2d 170). “Generally, information provided by an identified citizen accusing another individual of a specific crime is legally sufficient to provide the police with probable cause to arrest” (People v. Bero, 139 A.D.2d 581, 584, 526 N.Y.S.2d 979; see Wasilewicz v. Village of Monroe Police Dept., supra; Kracht v. Town of Newburgh, 245 A.D.2d 424, 425, 666 N.Y.S.2d 197; Minott v. City of New York, 203 A.D.2d 265, 267, 609 N.Y.S.2d 334). Based upon, inter alia, a complaint from an identified citizen that two men were breaking into a garage at a specified location, and the observations and investigation at the scene of the defendant Police Officer Jack Lupin, and statements given to him thereat, Police Officer Jack Lupin had probable cause to arrest the plaintiffs. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 13, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)