Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ANTHONY O. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, respondent; Lillian O. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1). In the Matter of Nicholas K. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, respondent; Lillian O. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2). In the Matter of Tabitha K. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, respondent; Lillian O. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 3).
In three related child neglect proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the maternal grandmother appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Westchester County (Cooney, J.), dated March 6, 2003, which, after a hearing, found that the subject children were neglected, continued their placement with the Commissioner of the Westchester County Department of Social Services for one year, and extended the placement until April 1, 2003.
ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order of fact-finding and disposition as continued placement of the children with the Commissioner of the Westchester County Department of Social Services for one year and extended the placement until April 1, 2003, is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.
The appeal from so much of the order of fact-finding and disposition as continued placement of the children with the Commissioner of the Westchester County Department of Social Services must be dismissed as academic. That portion of the order expired by its own terms on April 1, 2003 (see Matter of Garth S., 309 A.D.2d 940, 941, 766 N.Y.S.2d 96, lv. denied 1 N.Y.3d 506, 776 N.Y.S.2d 222, 808 N.E.2d 358; Matter of Nathifa B., 294 A.D.2d 432, 742 N.Y.S.2d 646; Matter of Hope S., 278 A.D.2d 329, 330, 717 N.Y.S.2d 331). However, the appeal from so much of the order of fact-finding and disposition as found that the subject children were neglected is not academic, since a finding of neglect constitutes a permanent and significant stigma from which potential future consequences may flow (see Matter of Jessica DiB., 6 A.D.3d 533, 775 N.Y.S.2d 69; Matter of Nathifa B., supra ).
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Family Court's determination that she neglected the subject children is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct. Act §§ 1012[f][i][A], 1046 [b][i]; Matter of Jessica DiB., supra; Matter of Nathifa B., supra; Matter of Noemi B., 273 A.D.2d 304, 708 N.Y.S.2d 477; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v. Anne F., 225 A.D.2d 620, 639 N.Y.S.2d 449; Matter of Lillian R., 196 A.D.2d 503, 504, 600 N.Y.S.2d 756).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 21, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)