Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: MATTHEW RR., Alleged to be a Person in Need of Supervision. Helen A. Carson, as Attendance Officer, Greenville Central School, Respondent; Matthew RR., Appellant.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Greene County (Lalor, J.), entered June 11, 2001, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct. Act article 7, to adjudicate respondent a person in need of supervision.
In response to a petition filed to have him adjudicated a person in need of supervision, respondent appeared before Family Court and admitted certain allegations in the petition, including possessing tobacco at school, while denying others. After a fact-finding hearing, Family Court determined respondent to be a person in need of supervision. A dispositional hearing was held and Family Court, relying in part upon respondent's admissions, initially directed respondent to be placed in the custody of the Greene County Department of Social Services and, subsequently, by amended order of fact finding and disposition, directed that respondent be placed in a group home for a one-year period.
Inasmuch as the record reflects that respondent was not advised of his right to remain silent prior to his in-court admissions (see Family Ct. Act § 741 [a]; Matter of Nichole A., 300 A.D.2d 947, 948, 753 N.Y.S.2d 162 [2002] ), respondent's adjudication as a person in need of supervision must be reversed and the order of disposition vacated (see Matter of Nichole A., supra at 948, 753 N.Y.S.2d 162; Matter of Ashley A., 296 A.D.2d 627, 628, 745 N.Y.S.2d 121 [2002]; Matter of Jodi VV., 295 A.D.2d 659, 660, 743 N.Y.S.2d 195 [2002]; Matter of Shaun U., 288 A.D.2d 708, 709, 732 N.Y.S.2d 483 [2001] ).
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Family Court of Greene County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.
SPAIN, J.
CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, CARPINELLO and LAHTINEN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 01, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)