Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: David BURR, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Following a disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of disobeying a direct order and not guilty of creating a disturbance. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination of guilt. The misbehavior report relates that after being seen on sick call, petitioner refused multiple orders to return to his cell. Petitioner eventually complied once the area supervisor was called. At the hearing, petitioner acknowledged that he failed to comply with the orders but claimed that he could not walk back to his cell without assistance. The misbehavior report, testimony from the correction officers involved in the incident and petitioner's own explanation provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Cepeda v. Goord, 305 A.D.2d 914, 758 N.Y.S.2d 866 [2003], lv. denied 100 N.Y.2d 511, 766 N.Y.S.2d 165, 798 N.E.2d 349 [2003]; Matter of Allende v. Selsky, 302 A.D.2d 764, 754 N.Y.S.2d 916 [2003] ). We are unpersuaded by petitioner's assertion that the inconsistency in the exact number of orders issued by the area supervisor warrants annulment of the determination as there is no dispute that an order, in fact, was issued and petitioner failed to comply. Petitioner's remaining contention challenging a gap in the hearing transcript has been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 24, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)