Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Antonia ANGELONE, etc., et al., appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mega, J.), dated July 27, 2006, as granted those branches of the defendant's motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the first and third causes of action in the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and those branches of the defendant's motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the first and third causes of action are denied.
The 4 1/212-year-old infant plaintiff allegedly was injured when she fell from playground equipment located at the Crescent Beach Park on Staten Island (hereinafter the park). The plaintiffs alleged, inter alia, that the infant plaintiff's injuries were the result of negligence in designing, constructing, and maintaining the playground equipment at the park by the defendant City of New York. Following joinder of issue and discovery, the City moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. In the order appealed from, the Supreme Court, among other things, granted the City's motion. We reverse the order insofar as appealed from.
The City failed to establish its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law since it did not present evidence that it maintained the playground equipment at the park in a reasonably safe condition (cf. Sobti v. Lindenhurst School Dist., 35 A.D.3d 439, 439, 825 N.Y.S.2d 251; Swan v. Town of Brookhaven, 32 A.D.3d 1012, 1013, 821 N.Y.S.2d 265; Banks v. Freeport Union Free School Dist., 302 A.D.2d 341, 341-342, 753 N.Y.S.2d 890).
The parties' remaining contentions either are without merit or need not be addressed in light of our determination.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 07, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)