Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Elayne BROOKS, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF BABYLON, Appellant.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), dated September 25, 1997, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the cross motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant, Village of Babylon, to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained when she tripped over a portion of concrete sidewalk which had been raised by tree roots. The Village sought summary judgment on the ground that it did not have prior written notice of the alleged defect (see, Village Law § 6-628). The plaintiff opposed the cross motion, inter alia, on the ground that the Village created the allegedly defective condition by an affirmative act of negligence.
The Supreme Court erred in denying the Village's cross motion for summary judgment. The Village established a prima facie case that it did not have prior written notice of the alleged defect, which is a condition precedent to maintaining an action against the Village arising from a sidewalk defect (see, Village Law § 6-628; Sloan v. Village of Hempstead, 223 A.D.2d 632, 636 N.Y.S.2d 852; Tyschak v. Incorporated Vil. of Westbury, 193 A.D.2d 670, 597 N.Y.S.2d 474; Mollahan v. Village of Port Washington, N., 153 A.D.2d 881, 545 N.Y.S.2d 601). “While no prior written notice of defect is necessary where there is an affirmative act of negligence (see, Marona v. Incorporated Vil. of Mamaroneck, 203 A.D.2d 337, 609 N.Y.S.2d 938; Tyschak v. Incorporated Vil. of Westbury, supra), the plaintiff's unsubstantiated allegation that the Village created the defective condition, made in the affirmation of her attorney, who had no personal knowledge of the facts, was insufficient to defeat” the Village's cross motion (Sloan v. Village of Hempstead, supra, at 633, 636 N.Y.S.2d 852).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 22, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)