Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Robert L. MORETTI, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 26, 2004, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he failed to comply with registration requirements.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits for a specified period because he failed to comply with registration requirements. It is well settled that “[c]ertifying for benefits in accordance with the Labor Law and the applicable regulations is a necessary prerequisite to eligibility for benefits” (Matter of Prieto [Commissioner of Labor], 255 A.D.2d 859, 860, 681 N.Y.S.2d 123 [1998]; see Matter of Larkin [Commissioner of Labor], 12 A.D.3d 829, 829, 784 N.Y.S.2d 261 [2004] ). While failure to comply with the reporting requirements can be excused for good cause shown, this is a factual question for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Del Vecchio [Commissioner of Labor], 288 A.D.2d 548, 731 N.Y.S.2d 802 [2001] ).
Here, the record establishes that claimant failed to comply with the instructions in the unemployment insurance instruction booklet and the initial adverse determination stating that he must continue to certify for benefits each week even while awaiting the outcome of his hearing request. Claimant's contention that he was given contrary advice from an employee at the Department of Labor regarding the need for weekly certification while awaiting a hearing presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Stabile [Commissioner of Labor], 250 A.D.2d 906, 672 N.Y.S.2d 517 [1998] ). Notably, the record establishes that even after receiving a favorable outcome regarding his hearing request, claimant delayed in certifying for benefits. Under these circumstances, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 07, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)